Present: Edie Lederman Joe Quaranta Sarita Kaza Alan Liu Demetre Daskalakis Yince Loh Yolanda Troublefield Melissa Fischer Roland Knoblauch John-Paul Mead Rich Westreich Jason Kornberg Diana Yoon Not Present: (* = excused) Deowall Chattar Craig Gordon* Eric Kim Nayan Sivamurthy Seth Dailey Mike Henry Stephen PoolNew Items:
Sweatshirts (grey, print navy) 24M, 48L, 72 XL $27.75 each Shorts (navy and black, print white) 12 S, 24 M, 24L, 12 XL $17.75 eachGot the OK to go to Rosina and give him a check for the order. He also listed tax separately, but we are a tax exempt organization, so Sarita has to get forms from Rosina and talk to the printer about this part of the bill.
The new approach will try and integrate courses using a supercourse director for each segment, limiting lecture hours to 5-10 per week, and adding about 6 hours of discussion per week. Some of this is based on a University of Michigan model, so we will try and get feedback from people there on their system. The proposals for NYU will not copy a model, however, they will just try and look at what is working in other places.
It is unclear what is being proposed by the subcommittees, this is where we need to work from for now. The informatics committee, on which Edie and John-Paul sit, is also currently working on broad proposals that may be presented in the future, but they need to communicate with the higher committee. The third year subcommittee is currently working on the issue of the basic science elective, and since much can't be done with that now, perhaps they should look at the placements of students in the satellite programs.
Roland did not have a prepared list of reasons why or how the MD/PhDs were different or not being represented under the current system, but suggested that since the program is distinct there should be direct representation. He pointed out that MD/PhDs stay at the medical center longer than anyone, and that there is some tension (after the first two years) between MD/PhDs and both the medical and graduate student groups.
The counter-argument was based on the fact that Student Council requested a reduction in the number of students on the CORE subcommittee to make the group more consistent, cohesive, and effective, and that in theory the MD/PhDs are being represented by their class presidents and by the Sackler rep during the lab years. However, it is unclear whether the MD/PhDs vote for the Sackler rep and whether this is adequate. So Joe closed with four general options which everyone needs to think about and have proposals ready for next week:
Proposals can be put out to everyone on the council mailing list to get feedback ad so people can be aware of them before the next meeting.